成本與管理會計學
國立政治大學 2025 · 考試 · 7 題
整卷連續作答,作答時答案與解析隱藏;按「交卷」後揭曉正解、標準解析並自動批改(申論/計算題不計分,供自行對照)。
- 第 1 題計算
Memory Company is a manufacturer of picture frames. Every picture frame passes through two departments: assembly and finishing. Each department has one direct-cost category (direct materials) and one indirect-cost category (conversion costs). As work in assembly is completed, each unit is transferred to the finishing department. As each unit is completed in the finishing department, it is transferred to finished goods. This problem focuses on the finishing department. For the finishing department, direct materials are added when the process is 90% complete, and conversion costs are added evenly during the process. Spoiled units are detected upon inspection at the 80% stage of production and are disposed of with a net disposal value of zero. Normal spoilage is 5% of the good units that pass inspection. Data for the finishing department for October 2024 are as follows:
Physical units Transferred-in costs Direct materials Conversion costs Work-in-process inventory, October 1 (a) 10,000 $195,800 $0 $111,600 Transferred-in during October 24,000 Good units completed and transferred out during October 26,000 Work-in-process inventory, October 31 (b) 6,000 Total costs added during October $637,200 $143,000 $329,400 (a) Degree of completion: conversion costs, 50%. (b) Degree of completion: conversion costs, 30%.
Required:
- Using the FIFO method of process costing, what is the cost of goods completed and transferred to finished goods during October? (5%)
- Using the weighted-average method of process costing, calculate the cost per good unit completed and transferred to finished goods during October. (5%)
- Use your previous calculations to comment on the cost performance of the finishing department. (4%)
- Assuming all spoilage is detected at the 20% of the process rather than the 80% of the process, calculate the physical units of abnormal spoilage incurred in October. (4%)
- 第 2 題計算
Alpha Company has two divisions, AA and BB, organized as decentralized profit centers. Managers are free to decide if they will participate in any internal transfers. All transfer prices are negotiated. Division AA produces television screens, and Division BB buys television screens and assembles the TV sets. There is a market for both the screens and the TV sets. Division AA has the capacity to produce 80,000 units of screens and can sell 69,000 units annually to the external market at a price of $200 per unit. Division BB has the capacity to produce 20,000 units of TV sets and can sell 16,000 units annually to the external market at $800 per unit. Division BB needs a screen to produce a TV set, and is currently purchasing screens from an outside supplier at a cost of $140 each. The following information is known about the two divisions:
Division AA (per screen) Division BB (per TV set) Variable manufacturing costs per unit $60 $370 Fixed manufacturing costs per unit 25 60 Variable operating expenses per unit 10 35 Fixed operating expenses per unit 20 100 The manager of Division BB believes that a 5% reduction in the selling price of the TV sets will increase the sales volume of 16,000 by 15%. He wants all screens Division BB uses to come from one supplier and has offered to pay Division AA $100 for each unit. If Division AA refuses to meet the $100 price, Division BB will still have to purchase screens from an outside supplier at $140 each. Division AA currently manufactures a screen that is similar to the screen used by Division BB. The specifications for Division BB are slightly different. To manufacture the new screens, Division AA would have to reduce production of its regular screens. On the other hand, Division AA can reduce direct material costs by $5 per unit and variable operating expenses by $8 per unit on intracompany transactions.
Required:
- Compute the estimated effect on the annual profits of Division BB, if it reduces its sales price by 5% and can acquire 18,400 screens internally at $100 each. (5%)
- From Division AA's perspective, what is the minimum transfer price at which Division AA would be willing to sell 18,400 screens to Division BB? (Please round your answer to the nearest dollar.) (5%)
- If Division BB acquires 18,400 screens from Division AA at $100 each instead of purchasing them from the outside supplier, what will be the effect on the company's annual profits as a whole? (5%)
- 第 3 題計算
For the quarter ending June 30, TD manufacturing Company reported the following account balances (unless specified otherwise):
Account Amount Sales revenue $2,500,000 Work-in-process inventory (April 1) 140,400 Work-in-process inventory (June 30) 171,000 Finished goods inventory (April 1) 540,000 Finished goods inventory (June 30) 510,000 Direct materials used 420,000 Indirect materials used 84,000 Direct manufacturing labor 480,000 Indirect manufacturing labor 186,000 Property taxes on manufacturing plant building 28,800 Salespersons' company vehicle costs 12,000 Depreciation of manufacturing equipment 264,000 Depreciation of office equipment 123,600 Miscellaneous plant overhead 135,000 Plant utilities 92,400 General office expenses 305,400 Marketing distribution costs 30,000 Required:
- What's the cost of goods manufactured for the quarter? (4%)
- What's the operating income for the quarter? (4%)
- 第 4 題計算
Blessing Corporation produces two types of soft drinks: 12 Qiang and Gold Medal. The budgeted and actual operating data for the year 2024 are as follows:
Budgeted result 12Qiang Gold medal Total Sales volume in units 22,500 90,000 112,500 Contribution margin $5,625,000 $18,000,000 $23,625,000 Actual result 12Qiang Gold medal Total Sales volume in units 24,750 57,750 82,500 Contribution margin $9,300,000 $15,300,000 $24,600,000 Required:
- Determine the total flexible-budget variance and the total sales-volume variance in terms of the contribution margin. (4%)
- Determine the total sales-mix variance and the total sales-quantity variance in terms of the contribution margin. (4%)
- 第 5 題計算
Donky Corp. has decided to venture into central processing unit (CPU) manufacturing. The company recently acquired a new machine capable of producing two types of CPUs: BETA and POWER. The POWER CPU outperforms the BETA CPU; however, due to intense market competition, Donky remains uncertain about the timing and quantity of customer orders for the upcoming year, even though overall market demand is projected to increase by 1,000 units compared to this year. The new machine has an annual capacity of 8,000 hours. The following information pertains to this year:
Type Annual Average Number of Orders Manufacturing Time Required Selling Price per Order If Average Manufacturing Cycle Time per Order is More Than 150 Hours Variable Cost per Order Inventory Carrying Cost per Order per Hour BETA 150 40 hours $19,400 $15,000 $0.60 POWER 20 50 hours 18,100 14,000 0.55 For BETA, if the average manufacturing cycle time per order is less than 150 hours, its selling price is $600 higher than when the average manufacturing cycle time per order exceeds 150 hours. For POWER, if the average manufacturing cycle time per order is less than 150 hours, its selling price is $400 higher than when the average manufacturing cycle time per order exceeds 150 hours.
Required:
- Calculate the average manufacturing cycle time per order if Donky manufactures only BETA. (2%)
- Calculate the average manufacturing cycle time per order if Donky manufactures both BETA and POWER. (2%)
- Given the intense market competition and uncertainty, Donky's managers are assessing whether the company should focus exclusively on producing and selling BETA or produce and sell both BETA and POWER. Which option will maximize Donky's operating income, and by how much? (5%)
- Due to intense market competition and high demand uncertainty, John, the manager of the manufacturing department, has advised the CEO that as the manufacturing cycle increases, sunk costs will decrease, opportunity costs will increase, and inventory carrying costs will rise. Based on this reasoning, John suggests that the new machine should maintain some excess capacity. The CEO has sought your opinion on John's recommendation. Please provide your comments on John's views and reasoning. (8%)
- 第 6a 題申論
Martin Toy Company Innovative Strategy Analysis (2025-2030)
Background Information (As of December 2024)
Martin Toy, a Taiwanese company established in 2005, has evolved into a mid-sized player in the digital toy market. The company has transformed from a traditional toy manufacturer to a provider of smart, connected play experiences.
Current Market Position
- Revenue (2024E): $45 million
- Market share: 3% of European digital toy market
- Product portfolio: 50 smart toys and digital play platforms
- Geographic presence: Europe (65%), North America (20%), Asia (15%)
- Key product segments:
- Connected learning toys (ages 3-5)
- Smart gaming devices (ages 5-8)
- Educational robotics (ages 6-12)
Industry Context 2024
- Market Trends:
- Increasing demand for AI-enabled learning toys
- Growing emphasis on sustainability in toy manufacturing
- Rise of mixed reality play experiences
- Integration of STEAM education in toys
- Heightened focus on data privacy and security
- Competitive Landscape:
- Traditional toy companies expanding into digital
- Tech giants entering educational toy market
- Emergence of direct-to-consumer toy brands
- Growing competition from Asian smart toy manufacturers
- Technological Developments:
- Advanced AI and machine learning capabilities
- Improved battery and sustainable materials
- Enhanced connectivity (5G/6G integration)
- Advanced sensors and haptic feedback
- Cloud-based gaming and learning platforms
Company's Current Challenges
- Digital Transformation:
- Need to upgrade legacy IT systems
- Data analytics capabilities require enhancement
- Cybersecurity concerns with connected toys
- Market Expansion:
- Limited presence in emerging markets
- Need for localization of digital content
- Competition from larger tech-savvy competitors
- Operational:
- Supply chain vulnerability
- Rising production costs
- Talent acquisition in tech roles
- Sustainability compliance requirements
Required
Part 1: Strategic Analysis
Analyze Martin's innovation strategy for 2025-2030:
- Evaluate Martin's advantages relative to its competitors (4%)
- Assess the external opportunities available to Martin (3%)
- Based on the above evaluations, what innovation strategies can Martin develop? (3%)
Part 2: Innovation Strategy Map
Develop a strategy map for 2025-2030:
- Create a balanced scorecard-based strategy map (including strategy theme and strategy target) (8%)
- Explain how your proposed initiatives address future market needs (2%)
- 第 6b 題計算
Part 3: Financial Analysis
The following data is provided for evaluating one of your proposed innovations - the "AI Learning Companion" project (part of Martin Toy Company's innovation strategy for 2025-2030, see background in the preceding question):
Project Data (2025-2027):
- Initial Costs
- Platform development cost: $2.5 million
- Marketing and launch cost: $0.8 million
- Subscription revenue: $15/month per user received at the end of each month
- Operating cost: $5/month per user paid at the beginning of each month
- Required rate of return: 12%
- Discount factors:
Table 1: Present Value of 1
Rate(r) 1 yr 2 yrs 3 yrs 4 yrs 5 yrs 10% 0.909 0.826 0.751 0.683 0.621 11% 0.901 0.812 0.731 0.659 0.593 12% 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567 13% 0.885 0.783 0.693 0.613 0.543 14% 0.877 0.769 0.675 0.592 0.519 Table 2: Present Value of an Ordinary Annuity of 1
Rate(r) 1 yr 2 yrs 3 yrs 4 yrs 5 yrs 10% 0.909 1.736 2.487 3.170 3.791 11% 0.901 1.713 2.444 3.102 3.696 12% 0.893 1.690 2.402 3.037 3.605 13% 0.885 1.668 2.361 2.974 3.517 14% 0.877 1.647 2.322 2.914 3.433 Table 3: Present Value of an Annuity Due of 1
Rate(r) 1 yr 2 yrs 3 yrs 4 yrs 5 yrs 10% 1.000 1.909 2.736 3.487 4.170 11% 1.000 1.901 2.713 3.444 4.102 12% 1.000 1.893 2.690 3.402 4.037 13% 1.000 1.885 2.668 3.361 3.974 14% 1.000 1.877 2.647 3.322 3.914 Table 4: Subscription Forecasts
Scenario Pessimistic (25%) Realistic (50%) Optimistic (25%) Year 1 10,000 20,000 35,000 Year 2 15,000 30,000 50,000 Year 3 20,000 40,000 70,000 Required:
- Calculate the expected NPV of the AI Learning Companion project and evaluate its feasibility (10%)
- Evaluate how this project supports Martin's digital transformation strategy (4%)
- Initial Costs